tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4886595570005494885.post3973925685295757017..comments2008-10-02T16:00:04.813-04:00Nurseb911http://www.blogger.com/profile/04974722323117696369noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4886595570005494885.post-84639716246904360902008-10-02T16:00:00.000-04:002008-10-02T16:00:00.000-04:00I can see the +/- from both sides on this one, but it does make me wonder why they wouldn't access the cancellation they alloted for unless they still perceive their shares to only be fairly valued.<BR/><BR/>I'm still in my position as the strengths still outweight any weaknesses, but it has me puzzled to say the least.<BR/><BR/>Thanks for commenting D4L!Nurse B, 911http://www.blogger.com/profile/13599091589209075856noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4886595570005494885.post-30301765819678000742008-10-02T12:42:00.000-04:002008-10-02T12:42:00.000-04:00I guess it isn't always in the company's best interest for the shareholders to be fully informed.<BR/><BR/>Best Wishes,<BR/>D4LDividends4Lifehttp://www.dividends4life.comnoreply@blogger.com