Showing newest 18 of 19 posts from October 2008. Show older posts
Showing newest 18 of 19 posts from October 2008. Show older posts

Wednesday, October 29, 2008

Confessions of a Value Investor II:

Part of the price value investors pay is buying into a market before the bottom is confirmed or the cessation of selling has completed and one quality that serves any value investor well is humility.

I own 170 shares of Manulife Financial (MFC) and through this market decline I’ve watched those shares trade within a tight conservative range as many other global financials have fallen precipitously or failed. On October 1st Manulife finally had its moment in the crosshairs and began a sharp decline of over 45% during twenty-seven days as investors sent it to a new 52-week low.

As the stock declined below $25 every piece of data I had told me the company was significantly under-valued. My Situational Analysis was unchanged and no matter how hard I tried to find significant weakness in the company I came up empty. As a long-term investor I was mesmerized by the opportunity I found at my fingertips. As I watched the share price accelerating downwards I was perpetually tempted to pull the trigger on doubling my position with the cash I had available.

Yet I knew my emotions were getting the best of me...so I walked away.

How much I would be up today on that stock and the long-term gains that I’ve missed out on from that decision I don’t care to know. Likely I missed the best opportunity I will ever have to snatch up shares of Manulife at such a low valuation; $0.37 per share away from a 5% yield.

What did I buy instead? I bought a boring energy infrastructure trust, Alta Gas (ALA.UN), which pays out a 12% yield and is just 3% of the market capitalization of Manulife.

Why would I do such a thing? I blame it on discipline.

The fact is that at the time I had a 4.5% exposure to Manulife in my portfolio and doubling my exposure would have made it worth over 8%. For all of the upside that I could have enjoyed I could have as easily exposed my portfolio to a significantly higher downside. I made the choice of diversification despite knowing that Manulife remains one of my favourite stocks. I ignored emotions and made the disciplined decision even though I knew, from my analysis and due diligence, that Manulife was the better investment.

Did I make the right decision in hindsight? Yes.
Is that something that’s easy to swallow based on where Manulife currently trades? No.

The trouble with investing, and it can be seen in the volatility of this current market, is the impact of emotions on decisions. As an independent investor you have to concentrate your attention on mitigating risk because no one else is going to do it for you. Despite the enthusiasm for many to gamble with their capital I don’t share that attitude or interest. My goal is on long-term appreciation of a diversified portfolio and I know, ego aside, that I made the right decision.

There are always opportunities to make a big gain, but you can also lose as much or more when you're focus is away from focusing on risk.

See Also:
Confessions of a Value Investor I


Click here to see how future posts can be delivered directly to you

Monday, October 27, 2008

My Dividend Dream:

Choosing an investment strategy is never an easy task for an investor. It involves a significant amount of consideration, turmoil over conflicting advice & opinions and most importantly asking yourself if you have the discipline to carry out your plan for the time frame you’ve allotted.

On May 4th, 2007, after nearly a year of preparation, I embarked on what I believe will be one of the most important decisions I make in my young life. I bought 75 shares of what I consider to be the premier dividend stock among all public Canadian corporations: Manulife Financial (MFC). During the rest of that month I made purchases of Sunlife (SLF), Empire (EMP.A) and Saputo (SAP) followed in June by purchases of Royal Bank (RY), Shoppers Drug Mart (SC) and Thomson-Reuters (TRI). Fast forward seventeen months through one of the toughest markets in recent memory caused by a credit crisis felt round the world and I’ve nearly completed acquiring the full list of Canadian stocks I set out to initially buy.

What I’m talking about is my decision to design, research and create my Dividend Growth Portfolio, known in my posts as DivG. I call this portfolio my Dividend Dream because in twenty five years the end outcome might become just that; my dream. When I look to this portfolio and I consider how fortunate I’ve been to buy so many of these stocks at historically cheap valuations the full value of my actions is difficult to measure. Despite being down in value I’ve protected my capital well relative to the broader market and increased my income from dividends substantially. When I began my initial accumulation phase of the portfolio I had anticipated a timeline of 2-3 years to secure positions in my targeted stocks, but after cannibalizing my Value Portfolio after some serious though I’ve accomplished nearly all my objectives in half the time.

Early in my investing progression I decided that one of my goals would be to let money and debt work for me instead of working against it. In the future I want money to provide me with flexibility to do the things I want, give me the ability to make decisions independent of finances and allow time to create that wealth for myself and my family. I don’t have grand visions of an early retirement with millions in assets, but instead an adaptation of my lifestyle to reflect what’s important to me and those around me. My Dividend Dream will help me get to that point in life.

My RSP and DivG portfolios are now nearly mirror images of each other based on the fundamental lessons taught to me of Enduring Value. My interpretation of Enduring Value comes from an important friendship and in its most basic form is what guided the investment activities of a mentor for a number of decades. My interpretation and application is a hybrid of the pure form taken from these lessons and blended with my own individually created Value Rules. The resulting hybrid has its foundation in the classic value teachings of Graham, but focuses on companies that always make money, have highly competent management, dominant brands & operations, pursue or maintain a sustainable competitive advantage in their area of strength, know their customers inside & out and create an emotional response that drives eternal consumption. I want to invest in businesses that have predictable operations, earnings and growth.

As I’ve talked about before one of Charles’ priorities before ever sharing his stock picking process was for me to understand intimately both the successes and the failures of many successful investors. It has been his long held belief that far too often an investor becomes concerned with the valuation of a company based on quantitative data rather than looking at a valuation based on its qualitative fundamentals. If you were to ask any seasoned value investor what their number one regret might be Charles would expect them to honestly share that they neglected stocks with a reasonable valuation and dominant fundamentals in favour of buying companies with heavily discounted valuations and less dominant fundamentals.

There’s no replacement for an ability to identify and buy great businesses at great valuations with the intention of holding them forever, but Enduring Value hinges on the ability of an investor to focus on the qualitative factors of a business over the long-term instead of sticking to an absolute price and over-analyzing a valuation based on quantitative values.

Enduring Value has made Charles a very wise investor, but what’s more surprising is that he did all this without any formal business training, reproduction/adaptation of investing styles or the quick access to information many of us take for granted today. The business models and brands that rarely changed over the decades are the hallmark of his portfolio. He made mistakes over the years as any investor does, but his commitment to quality always protected him from significant losses. If he didn’t understand the business he never bought a share, if he didn’t trust the people working for the company he never bought a share and if he wasn’t a customer of the company he never bought a share. He didn’t hoard cash waiting to time the market, but instead added to positions when they were low or he had the money.

In my post next week I’ll take readers inside my Dividend Dream portfolio for an up close look at my decision criteria, portfolio construction decisions and what names compose the entirety of the portfolio to date.


Click here to see how future posts can be delivered directly to you

Friday, October 24, 2008

A Haunted House of Investing - 2008:

I thought it might be fun to pick a number of investing personalities and predict what they might be for Halloween this year. If bloggers or readers have any wacky ideas please feel free to comment and maybe we can play some picture magic together.


Warren Buffett has been a busy man, but he's one of the only investors bullish on the US market. For this reason I feel that he'd be well suited up as the Lone Ranger this year.
Warren Buffett
Lone Ranger


Since Hank Paulson already convinced the US government to hand him $700B he might be inclinded to push his luck and ask for some more as Dr. Evil.

"I'll hold the world ransom for ONE HUNDRED million-billion dollars. Mua haha, MUA ha ha, MUA HA HA...."
Paulson
Dr. Evil


What kind of doctor would Paulson be though without his trusty sidekick Mini Me?
Neel Kashri
Mini Me


Richard Fuld (Lehman Brothers), Alan Schwartz (Bear Stearns) & Kerry Killinger (Washington Mutual) will be dressing up as The Three Amigos as they try to flee the US into Mexico with their millions of executive compensation bonuses for ruining their firms and billions of shareholder wealth.
Bad Bank Boys
Three Amigos


Manulife CEO Dominic D’Alessandro is certain to dress up as Scrooge McDuck as he plays in his Money Bin awaiting opportunities and acquisitions to add to his growing global insurance operations.
D'Alessandro
Money Bank


New York State Attorney General Andrew Cuomo will be dressing up as Repo Man as he targets AIG after it's frivolous spending right after securing a US government loan for luxury hunting trips and expensive retreats for management.
Andrew Cuomo
Repo Man


CIBC Economist Jeff Rubin wants to be The Genie from Disney's Aladdin, but not to make his kids laugh. Rubin wants to work some magic in the hopes of sending world oil prices up to $200 as he eagerly predicted this year.
Jeff Rubin
Aladdin Genie


Jim Cramer will be looking to expand his entertainment arsenal with bigger sound, lights and special effects as The Wizard of Oz.
Kramer
Wizard of Oz


Maple Leaf Foods CEO Michael McCain will be dressing up as The Magic Bullet. At least this way he can cut up his own luncheon meat and clean the mess up himself.
Michael McCain
Magic Bullet


BNN personality and NorthCoast Capital Managing Director Kevin O’Leary will be Captain Capitalism as he attempts to fight government intervention in the markets and seeks high yielding investments.
Kevin O'Leary
Captain Capitalism


Click here to see how future posts can be delivered directly to you

Capitalism Revisited:

Sramana Mitra, a technology entrepreneur and strategy consultant in Silicon Valley, writes a very interesting article on Forbes.com today about the current progression of capitalism in recent years.

"...I have long been troubled by the fact that Wall Street recruits some of the most highly educated talent in America into jobs that do not involve "building" or "leading." Rather, these professionals spend their lives "trading"--buying and selling equities, for example, in companies that other people have built with their blood, sweat and hearts. And of late, it appears that the best and the brightest have been applying their creativity and innovation into scams, mostly."

In the upcoming month I hope to read, review and conduct a private interview with Sramana Mitra about her new book Entrepreneur Journeys. As an investor and business person with a passion for strategic management I look forward to gaining the insights provided in this book and speaking with Sramana about her views of current business practices.

Her article on Forbes can be viewed here.

When To Sell:

Steve writes,

I've seen the light for quite some time now (I think), but I'm not ready for anything else besides the index. I'm stuck in limbo. I know where the real growth strategies are at. Why would I own the index when I can own the company myself? Again, I'm not ready and we both know that. For my peace of mind, I'll stick with the index and hope for the best. In a few years time I hope to look back and laugh at myself wishing I would have entered sooner.

I guess the major issue I would have, and most investors, would be when to sell. You never know when to, or if you should ever. This buy and hold strategy seems cumbersome because you just never know. Emotions seems to be the victim, but I believe that's when you create a capital gain %, and once you reach that goal you cash out. Afterwards you should re-organize and start all over and wait for prime buying opportunity if it comes available again - essentially what I see you doing.

When to sell…

This is a really tough question to answer and I think it depends entirely on the individual investor. You need a plan, the patience to see it through and the discipline to maintain it. You need the strength to resist emotion and have confidence in your ability to do so. For each investor when to sell an investment is an independent decision that you are responsible for making. Everyone knows that it’s easy to buy, but difficult to sell and the why is what eludes many. I 've always thought that it comes down to simple expectations.

When you invest you expect to make money. When you start to lose money there’s always hope that things will turn around and you maintain your expectation of making money. Only when it’s too late (you lose it all or simply give up) does the frustration and doubt begin to eat away at an investor.

There is always one simple truth about investing: You will lose money.

You will miss an opportunity to buy, you will hold off on selling until an opportune time has passed and you will lose some of what you’ve invested. The key for any investor is to understand that investing is an art of hitting the long ball. No baseball player can hit the ball successfully every at bat; that is a simple fact of the sport. What a player does when they show up every day at the park is give themselves the best opportunity to be successful through consistency. It’s not the homeruns that investors should be aiming for but the consistency exhibited by so many baseball greats that hit over 3000 hits in their career. They didn’t have half of the homeruns of other players, but batted consistently above .300 throughout their entire careers. This is how you approach buying, holding and selling when you invest. You’re not going to get a hit every time maximizing on your opportunities becomes your key focus.

When I sell an investment is fairly simple:
  1. If I make a 30-50% gain in a short period of time, regardless of fundamentals, I take some off of the table. The stock might rocket up another 40% or might plummet to zero but regardless of what happens I never know for sure. Although I may have maximum confidence in my research I know that how the market perceives an investment isn’t necessarily always the same as my perceptions. By locking in a gain when I have the opportunity I give myself a number of options. I can always buy it back later at a higher or lower price, but I only ever make money when I sell.
  2. If on any investment I’ve lost 40% of the original value I sell, take a tax-loss if I can and remind myself that I can always look to re-enter the stock later while protecting the remainder of my investment. Then I study the investment and learn from my mistake.
  3. If fundamentals change to the downside or deteriorate I’m out. If a company decides to compete on price, diversify into a non-core business or management begins to lose control I’ll sell without hesitation.
  4. If I realize I’ve made a mistake in my analysis or chose a stock for the wrong reasons.
  5. When an investment has hit my fair value or sell target. When I buy a stock I have a fair market value (FMV) in mind and I like to buy an investment at a discount to this. This could be based on book value, net asset value or a discounted cashflow model. For many of my core holdings I have confidence that I’ll never sell them until retirement and look to add to them on weakness or when I need to re-balance. For non-core holdings (1-5 year hold) I will sell when I perceive them to be fully valued.
This is one important thing I want to address. You don’t need to buy at one moment, sell everything and then await the next opportunity in the markets. Cash is king for an investor because it gives you the opportunity to take advantage of situations in the market that you might not otherwise have if fully invested. Holding a minimum of 5% cash in a portfolio is likely a prudent decision based on this principle. I see a big difference between market timing and taking advantage of opportunities. Market timing, in my view, is making an assumption about where a stock may go over the short-term based on market movements. Taking advantage of an opportunity when a stock is miss priced in my favour is a sound investing fundamental.


Click here to see how future posts can be delivered directly to you

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

Stocks in the News – October 22, 2008:

It’s been a busy week reading up on quarterly earnings and acquisitions in my two portfolios. Here’s an update for interested readers.

Saputo (SAP) announced today that they have reached an agreement to purchase the Neilson Dairy operations from George Weston (WN) for $465M. Saputo, Canada’s largest cheese producer and a large North American operator, will add two Ontario plants of a combined 390 employees and annual sales of over $600M. I took the opportunity to add to my position this morning at $25.

Exelon (EXC) made an offer to acquire all of NRG Energy (NRG) for $6.2B in common stock that is aimed at adding to Exelon’s unregulated power operations. In a letter sent to David Crane (CEO of NRG) John Rowe (CEO of EXC) highlighted a number of synergies that Exelon was focusing on as motivation for this deal. I discussed Exelon in May of this year with Taking Stock in EXC and will be looking to add to my position on further weakness in the share price. The company benefits from a number of strategic moves on the part of management and is well positioned to make acquisitions in this current market.

Caterpillar (CAT) announced third quarter results for 2008 with a profit of $868M ($1.39 per share) as revenue rose and material costs soared that missed consensus earnings of $1.41 per share. The company had previously guided lower and announced full EPS expectations of $6.00. Caterpillar shares are down almost 50% YTD despite their ability to easily achieve a price to earnings ratio of 10x for 2008. I will be looking to add to my position shortly. This is a good example of my recent comments on how an investor should look to internal guidance rather than from analysts with an outside view of the company. Caterpillar is a long-term hold in my portfolio that will continue to do manage its resources well despite evidence of an emerging global recession.

Kimberly-Clark (KMB) reported third quarter results for 2008 with a profit of $0.99 per share in line with company guidance of $0.98-1.03 per share. On a year over year basis sales in North America rose 7%, 2% in Europe and 20% in developing/emerging markets.

Canadian National Railway (CNR) reported strong third quarter results despite increased fuel costs in the quarter with a profit of $1.16 per share. Their operating ratio for the quarter rose to 62.6% and impressive increases in operating results on a per car basis.

Husky Energy (HSE) reported third quarter EPS of $1.50 despite significant falls in both crude oil and natural gas prices and declines in production that were within management guidance for the quarter.

Dupont (DD) reported their third quarter EPS of $0.40 including hurricane related charges and guided 6% lower on full year earnings of $3.25-3.30 from its previous $3.45-3.55 target. Revenues rose over 9% as prices were increased broadly across their product portfolio.

(Disclosure: I hold common shares in SAP, EXC, CAT, KMB, CNR, HSE & DD)


Click here to see how future posts can be delivered directly to you

Monday, October 20, 2008

Taking Stock in COST:

Taking Stock in Costco
In a previous post I presented as part of my short-term investing strategy a long held Value Rule that a company never compete on price.

In the comments of the post the moneygardener asked the following question:

I'm curious about your thoughts on Costco. Do they compete on price? Why are they successful?

Costco (COST) is a company that I know quite well both as a consumer and prospective investor. I shop at Costco as a long time member and have always found the business model and strategy fascinating.

The simple answer to MG’s question is that Costco does not compete on price and what makes them successful is multifaceted. The company is brilliantly managed, knows its core customers well and has all the hallmarks of enduring value that I enjoy in my investments.

Readers might be scratching their heads and asking “how does Costco not compete on price when everything there is cheap?” but remember that this is all about strategic management. You never compete on price because it slashes your margins and that directly impairs your ability to make money. Margins are how you make money in business. An investor shouldn’t confuse low prices with low margins without first seeking to understand the business model and basic principles of economies of scale.

What you need to do is put a business in perspective and to objectively examine not just the obvious, but what goes on behind closed doors; what makes a company tick, work well and stay competitive in a retail space that is dominated by giants? What allows Costco to be successful is that they know their niche and have both the business strategy and operational capacity that allows them to perform remarkably well in passing along savings to their customers.

I want readers to maintain an open perspective and keep in mind the following reasons of why Costco doesn’t compete directly on price:
  1. They don’t sacrifice their margins in order to spur demand
  2. Their business plan creates savings
  3. Their discounting incentives are never perpetual
  4. Their customers are not motivated by price alone

Some Background:

Costco has its roots in San Diego, California when in 1976 Sol & Robert Price opened the first exclusive business club for shoppers in a remodelled airplane hanger that served as their first warehouse. By 1980 the Price Company offered public stock and a few years later another warehouse business, Costco opened for business in Seattle, Washington. As each business grew more warehouse stores were opened and their businesses expanded into new product offerings.

By 1989 Costco had 46 warehouses in operation and both corporations were aggressively growing their businesses. In 1993 shareholders of both companies approved the merger of Costco and Price Company to form PriceCostco (later Costco Companies). In 1997 the business streamlined operations by selling off non-core assets and today has operations in the US, Puerto Rico, Canada, UK, Korea, Taiwan, Japan and Mexico.

When examining Costco as a business I first want to address their business model. Specifically:
  • Do I understand the business
  • Is the business sustainable
  • What does the business do and do they do that best
  • Is management able to execute over long periods of time
  • Are there substantial competitive threats
  • Does a competitive advantage exist
From Costco’s 2007 Annual Report:

Costco operates “…membership warehouses based on the concept that offering our members very low prices on a limited selection of nationally branded and selected private-label products in a wide range of merchandise categories will produce high sales volumes and rapid inventory turnover. This rapid inventory turnover, when combined with the operating efficiencies achieved by volume purchasing, efficient distribution and reduced handling of merchandise in no-frills, self-service warehouse facilities, enables us to operate profitably at significantly lower gross margins than traditional wholesalers, mass merchandisers, supermarkets and supercenters.”

If you’re maintaining a SWOT on Costco there are a few key items you want to make sure you write down:
  • Membership structure encourages customer loyalty
  • Diversification of merchandise (both private & brand name)
  • High inventory turn-over
Whether you place those three items under strengths, weaknesses, opportunities or threats is your choice. Throughout my analysis I want to focus, target and investigate some key flags from that 2007 message and determine any threats when management uses the phrases “low prices” & “significantly lower gross margins”.


Analysis:

The business plan for Costco is very simple. The company buys directly from manufacturers and routes purchases directly to a consolidation point (hub) or individual warehouses in less than 24 hours. What this allows the company to do in their distribution system is not keep inventory idle or held up so that products can be purchased by customers as quickly as possible. Their in-warehouse inventory system knows when each item is sold and when product levels are reaching their targeted threshold for a reorder. A purchase order can be generated to the manufacturer for more products and shipped directly to the warehouse to be placed directly in storage for restocking.

High sales volume and rapid inventory turnover are very important and an investor shouldn’t overlook this point. When Costco puts in a purchase order with a manufacturer it will likely need to pay in full within 30-60 days for that purchase. When any company can receive product directly, sell it to a consumer and receive cash in hand before needing to pay for the original merchandise from the manufacturer this results in a very high operating cashflow for the business. Why is cashflow important?

Cash allows a company to pay its employees, bills and invest in the business without having to use expensive uses of debt. When the time comes for Costco to pay a manufacturer for products purchased it can often take advantage of discounts (2/10 net 30) and further reduce its cost of purchase. This operating principle improves Costco’s working capital and allows them to operate much more efficiently. Instead of having to pay the full cost of products from manufacturers and then wait for a sale to receive cash Costco can benefit from being the short-term intermediary between the core manufacturer and end customer.

The operating warehouses for Costco average 140,000 square feet of selling space. This space is used both horizontally and vertically to improve efficiencies. Inventory is sold directly at the floor level to customers and extra product stored vertically above the floor. This eliminates the need for holding excess inventory in non-customer areas that requires a large space and more financial resources can instead be focused on the customer.

Costco employs a very innovative warehouse design for multiple reasons and the design of their stores is something I’ve always appreciated since I concentrate on the strategic management of businesses and consumer behaviour.

Have you ever asked yourself the question, “How can I come into Costco for just milk & walk out spending $65?” Milk never costs $65 and in fact is likely the lowest margin item sold in Costco. The reason you walk out of Costco spending more than your intended $4 is because of how strategic management is utilized and the business’ ability to understand customer behavior.

Say you go to Costco for a bag of milk on your way home from work. At every Costco there is only ever one entrance and one exit for all customers. You are greeted by one or more employees on the way in and at least one on the way out. Immediately as you enter the warehouse you’re required to display your exclusive membership card and are immediately handed a coupon pamphlet of various discounted products. You then have to navigate the same landscape that is duplicated hundreds of times at every other Costco warehouse in North America. In order to get to the milk (located at the far back corner) you have to navigate your way through consumer electronics, home appliances, clothing, automotive, books, games and home accessories.

These are all high-margin items; the percentage markup from the manufacturer cost is higher than other products. Located at the rear and far side of the warehouse are food and household perishables which are lower margin and generally more frequently purchased items. These lower margin items are placed strategically opposite the entrance & exit because Costco wants you to browse, investigate, sample and spend more time in their stores in the hopes you’ll find something you want, need or decide to try. You then navigate the rest of the store back towards the checkout and are advertised to for supplementary business such as credit cards, small business loans, auto & home insurance, business telephone, check printing & real estate/mortgage services along your exit.

Costco boasts one of the lowest percentage inventory losses in the retail industry. This is primarily due to membership control and ensuring only one primary entry & exit in each warehouse. Less than 0.2% of total inventory is lost to theft in any given year. To put this into context US retailing giant Wal-Mart often reports inventory losses due to theft at 1.6% of total inventory; eight times higher than Costco.

Costco maintains an average of only 4,000 SKU’s (stockkeeping units) per warehouse in comparison to over 40,000 that are often found in a supermarket. This allows Costco to generate a much higher focus on the product needs of customers and not carry inventory that is not in high demand. Their product mix is also diversified and proportioned equally among six key units. Additional supplementary services include sales from pharmacy, photo, hearing-aid & optical centers, travel, gas and print/copy services. If a unit isn’t profitable at a specific warehouse than that service is not offered or discontinued.

Costco also provides select private label brand merchandise under the Kirkland® brand name. This enables manufacturers such as Proctor & Gamble and Kimberly Clark to sell generic versions of their Tide & Huggies products to Costco customers under the Kirkland brand name. Those companies still sell their premium brand products beside the generic versions at a higher margin and still benefit from a sale when customers choose either the generic or brand name product.

Marketing and promotional activities are very limited for Costco. Through either direct marketing initiatives (mailings to your home via Costco Magazine) or individual manufacturer coupon mailers Costco does not aggressively discount their products in order to spur demand. This is a very important when we examine their gross margins. From time to time Costco will rotate discounts through key high demand items, but after a promotion of 7-14 days the prices are adjusted back.

What they don’t do is sacrifice their gross margins in order to generate demand or higher sales over a long period of time. Competing on price is something I believe a company should never do. But there is a significant difference between a company offering a rotating weekly discount on less than 3% of their inventory to customers versus slashing margins across the board by 25-30% in order to secure a higher market share.

Because Costco is so efficient at managing its inventory it can afford to offer promotional discounts each week on select products or services, but they are never permanent or sustained. A 1kg box of cereal might be $2.00 off one week and then it immediately returns to its regular price of $7.99 once the promotion is complete. Often Costco isn’t even the primary source for these discounts and they are initiated my primary manufacturers in order to sell old inventory so that new product can be released for sale in future months. Costco adds a volume incentive for to manufacturers who understand that their customers make regular and repeated purchases of their favourite items. When and where you know exactly your end user will be is a massive benefit for many manufacturers who use Costco to sell their products.

In a city of 300,000 Kellogg’s may sell their products among as many as 500 different locations to consumers, but almost 20% of that entire volume may come from one or two Costco locations. This relationship with sales is contributing factor in the close relationships that Costco enjoys with key manufacturers.

The consumer is also vitally important to Costco. As much as consumers are motivated by price they enjoy the shopping experience at Costco. They recognize that discounts will be offered from time to time, but never permanently sustained. Costco does sell items at a lower price than their competitors, but remember that they can because of their ability to pass along the discounts from their operating efficiencies in supply chain management and cashflow. Costco also adds something unique to customers by offering products not found anywhere with their generic Kirkland brands and sells items in bulk that otherwise aren’t sold in smaller quantities. To many Costco customers Kirkland isn’t even considered a generic brand because of the tangible quality that exists.


Numbers:

It’s now time to examine the quantitative numbers of the business to determine how margins are affected by the operations of the business and the business model via management.

See Table:



This is simplified version of a spreadsheet I maintain on most companies on both current and historical data for my situational analyses. My intent is to compile information easily and look for trends that might give caution for investing in a company.

The first thing I’ll draw attention to is the gross margin data. You’ll see that for each year (1994-2007) I’ve listed the gross margin as a percent of sales. This is one of the first quantitative set of data I will collect if I suspect a company of competing on price. A sudden change, sharp decline or any trend downwards in the absence of a significant rise in inventory cost usually indicates to me that management is dropping the ball. In the case of Motorola a few years ago you would see a massive drop in gross margins from the historical trend.

Costco has maintained their gross margins within a very tight range over the last ten years. You’ll see a low of 10.10% in 1997 and a high 10.72% in 2004. The historical change averages out to 1% to the upside, so I’m very confident that Costco management is very focused on maintaining their margins and not competing on price by heavily discounting their margins. Even during difficult economic periods such as 2000-2002 you can see steady margins that indicate to me a very good grasp of management ensuring profitability.

Sales have increased just over 11% on average each year with warehouse growth at 6.11%. Long-term debt to equity has remained very low, Book value per share (BVPS) has been more than adequate and there’s been an aggressive commitment by management of the company to buy back common shares. Also notice the very strong growth in memberships of both businesses and individual Gold Star members.

One item I will point out that caught my attention some time ago is putting growth into proper perspective. I’ve spoken about the importance of assessing management in a company, but often I get the question of how an investor determines this. With each company it will be slightly different because they likely operate in different industries under much different conditions. So we know that the business is growing at a conservative pace, that margins are not being sacrificed and debt to equity hasn’t ballooned as in the case of a business being heavy leveraged.

There’s a section in the spreadsheet titled, “SGAE as % of net sales”. In any annual report you’ll find lots of numbers and putting them into context can be difficult. Costco supplies a graph with the title “Selling, General and Administrative Expenses” or SGAE as I’ve called it in my spreadsheet. If I want to evaluate management I want to know how well they manage the business on a variety of criteria and this is one of them. An investor wants to ask the question: Can Management Control Spending? Not just expenses of raw materials and labour, but what everyone spends on all expenses not related to the cost of inventory and overhead.

SGAE as a percentage of net sales has been maintained in a very tight range. As a business grows it’s very easy for management to lose focus and get lazy in their spending. When I add together the low D/E ratio, solid margin control and tight range of SGAE I get a very clear view of just how good the management of this company is. Remember that my #1 criteria for any group of management is the requirement that they have the pulse of the business and never stop taking that pulse. The numbers for Costco are always consistently within a very low variance year-over-year or from the historical average which gives me the impression that management is on top of operating this company in a smooth and efficient manner. They are growing the business within their means with no considerable effect to margins, warehouse growth and general expenses.

The main issue, as with any business, is when you get to the competitive analysis.

Costco operates in a highly competitive retail environment. Costco benefits from a base of niche customers via their membership program with those same customers able to purchase products from a wide variety of competing companies such as grocery stores and large scale retail operations. Competitors include Lowe’s, Wal-Mart, Target, Kohl’s, Home Depot, Office Depot, PetSmart, Staples, Trader Joe’s, Whole Foods, Best Buy and Barnes & Noble.

The company competes for leasable land for new warehouses with other box stores and their warehouse locations are often located further away from highly residential areas such as city cores and older suburban areas. Customers tend to have to drive further to shop at Costco than a local grocer, but Costco combats this with a much better customer environment, larger discounts on bulk purchases and various incentives through their membership programs.

The company is exclusively dependent on US & Canadian operations for revenue and profits and directly affected by how consumers behave. In any tough economic environment Costco has historically shown a resilience to persevere and continue growing their business. While I trust the management to continue doing what it does without diversifying into non-core operations any significant decrease to consumer spending has to be considered as a threat.The Bottom Line:
Sales growth for Costco has been consistent as warehouse growth for the company on an annual basis has been conservative and membership growth has continued on track. As Costco grows its membership base it enjoys a higher amount of traffic and continues to focus on growing its average transaction through various means. The company is well managed and benefits from a unique business plan that focuses on operational efficiencies. The company conclusively in my mind does not compete on price and I have no issues providing this company with my label of Enduring Value.

(Disclosure: I hold no position in COST)

See it on Seeking Alpha

Join my Stock Analysis Mailing List (SAML):
Subscribe or purchase full stock analysis posts!


Click here to see how future posts can be delivered directly to you

Wednesday, October 15, 2008

The Dividend Express:

Dividend ExpressI took the opportunity of further declines in the markets today to strengthen my position in Canadian Pacific Railway (CP). After buying a full position in Canadian National Railway (CNR) on Friday I was looking to rebalance my railway holdings into my original targeted ratio.

I view CNR as the better business and hold a higher weighting in my Canadian dividend portfolio of it (DivG) and I consider CNR the best North American rail company, but CP isn't far behind.

The long-term fundamentals of rail transportation is very strong even in the face of higher fuel prices. There continues to be increased demand for the transportation of bulk commodities & products from coast to coast and while transport over land by truck freight continues to be an important aspect of transportation in North America, rail companies continue to struggle to meet demand with adequate supply.

Canadian Pacific is currently trading at an attractive valuation when I consider its relative value compared to historical data.

With a seven year book value growth of over 22%, a yield of 2.10% vs. historical of 1.75% and annual dividend growth in excess of 12.5% CP has more than enough cashflow to continue raising its dividend, pay down corporate debt and continue to finance growth of its operations.

While Canadian Pacific's operating ratio (an industry measure of operating efficiency) continues to lag CNR by roughly 20% the company still continues to perform within management's expectations.


In other news:

I purchased additional shares in Atco Ltd (ACO.X) yesterday and initiated a position in Diageo PLC (DEO) for my RSP.

After watching a number of my fellow dividend peers getting drunk on Diageo I decided to examine the stock beyond my initial SWOT & PEST from 2007 and really liked its operations, management and diversified product portfolio. With a 5% yield at my purchase price, reasonable forward P/E on acceptable guidance (+/-5% Rule) and expanding operations in global markets DEO adds some much needed diversification to my RSP at a very attractive entry price.

I bought a half position of DEO with the intention to add in the coming months if the valuation falls further or stays put.

Tuesday, October 14, 2008

Manic Market Movements:

Well it appears today that I didn't buy enough on Friday.

After the US and International markets moved dramatically yesterday (us Canadians had our Thanksgiving Holiday) the markets are all moving higher again today.

What made me look brilliant on Friday for my buying binge could change tomorrow when I look equally foolish if stock prices decline once again. As an individual with professional experience working with acute mental illness I've termed this Bear Market as The Manic Market as it exhibits behaviour of someone who has manic depressive (bipolar) symptoms.

At the first glimpse of good news the markets are exhibiting exuberance and then crashing with dramatic fashion only to tick back up again at alarming speed. No investor can fault the market for this rebound as it was plainly obvious that stocks had over extended themselves to the downside. But I'll caution investors at this moment.

This is a time to be prudent, cautious and conservative. Although I've been advocating investors take a serious look at the long-term opportunities this equity market presents you need to understand that momentum is short-lived and very volatile. What you see today could change tomorrow as fear & emotion take over once again.

Being invested in these markets will continue to test you and how to meet those tests will shape the type of investor you may become. When I look at high quality blue chip dividend stocks moving in positive and negative directions at double digits percentages I know that the market is showing clear signs of a manic personality. That creates value, but it can also destroy it just as easily.

Stick to your plan and regardless of the day-to-day movements we see I think you'll benefit from the discipline of doing what you do best.

Monday, October 13, 2008

Stocks on the Cheap:

Over the past few months, before I even began liquidating my Value Portfolio, I began to sense an opportunity in the markets that I had waited a long time for since observing the declines of 2000-2002. Despite the perpetual pessimistic commentary being flooded into the media on this current crisis each investor needs to put this situation into the proper perspective. I’m not discounting the seriousness of present market conditions because they are real and investors are feeling the pain in their pockets. But what any investor needs to do is take stock in their financial situation and look beyond today towards tomorrow.

I’ve been speaking loudly through this blog for investors to properly examine their tolerance for risk. That’s not just important now in these market conditions, but at any point. We’re seeing a massive move on the part of many investors (retail & institutional) to liquidate investments in a hurried move to conserve equity and build cash. For right or wrong investors believe this is the prudent choice and I’m not here to tell anyone else what they should or shouldn’t do. What I can state clearly is that this behaviour is a direct result of investors not acknowledging their risk tolerance, not understanding what they were investing in or not even being aware of why those first two points are important.

Emotions, fear, panic & irrational decisions always create value and while this market decline might not be value in the eyes of many it certainly has caught my attention.


Relative Valuations:

The difficulty in assessing a market such as this is how to assess relative valuations of investments. The big cause for these declines is the loss of confidence between all parties for exposure to bad debt and credit obligations and a serious reassessment of risk. Large hedge funds have had to liquidate holdings in order to meet stricter lending requirements, investors are fearful of future financial failures and the contagion effect is evidently spreading to the rest of the equity markets and global economy. With the drastic fall of equity prices the subsequent price to earnings ratios (P/E) of many stocks has been reduced; in some cases by half or more.

For a specific company you own, research or want to invest in the question an investor needs to answer is: Do I anticipate operating earnings to remain stable, increase or decrease in the future?

If earnings are to decrease than you need to adjust both the current and forward P/E to reflect that change. A stock that has dropped from a P/E of 15 to 10 might appear to be good value, but if future earnings are to decrease 50% than the stock continues to trade at the same valuation. Another company with no expected change to earnings trading at a discount to its former P/E may just be suffering from a P/E contraction across the entire sector or could provide an investor with a much cheaper entry point than what you previously would have paid.

At this moment I view three types of valuations in the markets:
  1. There are bad businesses that are expensive for a reason
  2. There are decent businesses that are of fair value dependent on their future earnings
  3. There are great businesses that are very cheap relative to stable and/or increasing earnings
Companies with focused management, strong pricing power and diversified products & services will have more flexibility to better position their earnings potential. When you examine the forward P/E you may want to focus on companies where the profit projections aren’t dependent on volatile commodity prices, hard to decipher revenues and expenses and management that accurately deliver earnings within +/-5% of their guidance. This will give you a reasonable expectation of where to expect earnings to fall inline so that you can appropriately value an investment on a P/E basis if you choose to. What I anticipate moving forward is a lot of earnings volatility. Whether analyst consensus is achieved or not I feel that investors should do their own due diligence to make sure they understand how much they’re paying.


Catch a Falling Knife:

I’ve patiently observed the markets the past few weeks trying to gain a sense of perceptions, fear, fundamentals and relative value of investments and I’ve come to a few conclusions.

There have been numerous investors, pundits and professionals making clear statements of where they perceive the bottom (or lack thereof) to be and a variety of individual investors attempting to time the market for the expected recovery. It could come in the form of a 10-20% move in only a few short days, market prices could stabilize and return 0% over a five year period or plunge even further from where we are right now. The fact is I cannot time the bottom in order to know where the best value will be and likely no one can. People will use volatility, rules, past periods or trends but it’s mostly garbage in my view because this decline is nothing like anyone has seen in recent memory both on scale and speed. Since I am not able to time the bottom of the market than I have a number of choices to choose from.

One extreme is to sell now, book a large loss and sit in cash hoping to ride out this storm by preserving all my remaining capital. The problem is that by sitting with only cash I will likely miss the first glimmer of upside which could be a year’s worth of gains in only one day. In cash I will be drawing dead if all I earn is 4%, inflation is at 3% and my interest income is taxed 100% at my marginal tax rate.

The other extreme is to commit everything I have to my long-term positions now and ride out the storm for however long it takes. I collect my dividends every quarter, which are tax advantaged, but potentially see my invested capital continue to fall with the declines of the market.

The best alternative is a strategy that allows me to stay invested in the market, but keeps cash on hand for further purchases over the short-term. This will allow me to dollar cost average into my existing positions, increase the relative proportion of my dividend income and best position myself for the long-term. Each time I invest into more shares of my existing positions I am buying at a lower cost. While over the short-term this might appear to be a pointless strategy what I am doing is buying more shares at cheaper valuations for the future. Because I am in the contribution stage of my investing life (adding to investments for retirement) and I have a long-term investing horizon (25+ years) I’m taking the stance that the shares I own today will be worth substantially more in the future. The capital that I invest today may be only 10% of the total worth of my ending portfolio at retirement, so I have to maintain the proper perspective and context. If this market decline continues for another month and markets stay low for the next year I can periodically add to my positions on weakness without committing everything I have in a massive market binge.

What I have right now is an investment strategy that I hold superior confidence in. I’ve researched my plan, evaluated all the potential outcomes and have the confidence that this is the best available option for me. Every investor should have a plan that they are comfortable with, that takes into consideration their current & future risk tolerance and what they can execute without needing to change time after time.

There is nothing wrong with the alternative of sitting in cash if you’re mind is a mix of extreme emotions on the markets. During 2000-2002 I sat and watched with interest as the market collapsed under the pressure of the technology bubble. I knew then that I wasn’t anywhere near ready to invest into individual equities despite the value that was present. What I did was take a proactive approach and stick to the plan I had implemented then and invested accordingly regardless of what else was going on. I took the time to research, watch and observe market behaviour, insights, commentary and any lessons I could learn. I developed the patience, discipline and independent thinking to help overcome the emotional response to losing money. It’s never easy watching an investment lose value and no one enjoys it, but it is a part of investing and the market cycle. The key is to remember when to take advantage of opportunities and when to protect yourself from risk.

If you’re unsure of how to do either of those, then you’re best to stick to a very simple investing plan like the couch potato portfolio. A lot of my friends currently utilize this indexing strategy and I’ve had numerous questions about how these market conditions might change that plan. Friends want to know whether to hold onto or invest cash or stop making regular contributions.

If your investing strategy is to build your investments over the long-term, then I would advocate staying the course. An investor may want to increase contributions in order to take advantage of lower prices, but what you don’t want to do is drastically change your strategy. As in my post last week an investor can always choose to alter their asset allocation in order to reduce risk. Instead of a 60/40 equity-bond mix you may elect for a 50/50 split. Even sticking to your asset allocation will benefit your portfolio over the long-term.

As your equity funds have lost value during these past few weeks later this year when you rebalance you’ll be taking gains from bonds into your other funds to rebalance. If you’re committed to the couch potato strategy you want to be buying more of your reduced funds (buy low) with proceeds from your increased funds (sell high) when you rebalance. Trying to rebalance in volatile periods is akin to micromanaging your portfolio. While it might seem like a good idea at the time committing yourself to rebalancing at set dates is likely a disciplined move. Stopping contributions right now defeats the inherent benefit of the potato strategy by not using the buy low, sell high principles. Just as you would sell index equity funds in years of market gains to buy bonds you should now be turning around the strategy to do the opposite.


Click here to see how future posts can be delivered directly to you

Sunday, October 12, 2008

Current Crisis – What I've Done:

I want to make a public disclosure to readers and investing peers.

Over the past two and a half years my Value Portfolio has enjoyed some considerable gains and as of September 2008 it had boasted a CAGR of over 60% since inception. I spend a considerable amount of time studying stocks, running screens and enjoyed myself thoroughly throughout this experience as I wanted to see if I could commit an investing strategy from paper to real life and I succeed. Not all my stocks were winners, but I protected myself from losses and took advantage of opportunities when they appeared.

Over the past two weeks I have liquidated my holdings in the Value Portfolio even though YTD my return was well above 40%. The simple explanation I can provide is that when I put ego aside, the portfolio took a big time commitment and anyone knew that. In the future my time will be needed for more important activities (family, work & life) and if I can’t go 100% then I’m playing with fire for the stocks I was invested in and tracking. The other motivating factor is the current market decline, but I did not sell because I feared the market; I sold because of the clear opportunity the market presents me. At twenty-seven I need to be conscious of long-term opportunities and this market decline is currently a monster after seeing most major markets decline across the globe in excess of 20% in a very short period of time.

At my current pace the capital gains inevitably would cripple my plan and the time & effort put into those activities would escalate. Instead what I decided to do was look to this current decline as an amazing opportunity to put the proceeds from my Value Portfolio to good use as my new recent focus has been on quality rather than quantity. Over the next few months I’ll be transferring assets into my non-registered account and RSP to increase the cash available to buy more shares in stocks I already own. Many of these are what I consider to be “on the cheap” with a view of a long-term investor and present excellent opportunities to increase my wealth in the future.

I’ll continue to post analyses of value stocks, give insights into my Value Rules and contribute lessons on varying aspects of value investing, but my focus will be on a more conservative approach to investing over the long-term. I accomplished something in a short period of time that I had always wanted to try and I’m glad I gained this experience. But now is a time for an investor to be rational and I see greater long-term value in my high quality dividend investments than where I was investing recently in my Value Portfolio.

Investing is about balance and interpreting the right change to benefit your situation over the short and long-term. I’ve learnt a lot in a short period of eight years and I’m positive I have more to learn in the future. Instead of spending my time investing behind a closed door I can likely help others in a broader sense to benefit from what I’ve learnt.

In two weeks I’ll be posting insights into my Canadian dividend growth portfolio (DivG) including my decision criteria, portfolio construction and the complete holdings of my portfolio.

For those interested on Friday I increased my positions in Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS), Canadian National Railway (CNR), IGM Financial (IGM), Manulife (MFC), Power Financial (PWF), Russel Metals (RUS), TD Bank (TD), Sunlife Financial (SLF), Husky Energy (HSE) & Royal Bank (RY).

Happy Thanksgiving to Canadian Investors


Click here to see how future posts can be delivered directly to you

Wednesday, October 8, 2008

My Short-term Plan X:

This is the final component of my 10 part series on the core concepts I am focusing on in this difficult market environment. (Part I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII, IX)


Number 10:

Here is where we put it all together. Part of this series is all about seeing the big picture and helping investors to focus and get through a very difficult period.

Since I began this series the DJIA is down 15%, the S&P500 down almost 18% and the TSX is down almost 19%.

Any investor or company needs focus at times in order to be successful. Doing what you do best is what sets apart the amateurs in business from the true professionals and this is no different when investing. In a difficult economic environment an investor wants and needs to see the businesses they own moving towards their core customers in order to ensure profitability. This is not the time to expand into new businesses that a company has no experience or competencies operating within. A successful business will be able to go back to its grass roots of what made it successful and continue to be successful in tough economic periods.

A recession is a contraction of the economy and businesses need to contract in response to protect themselves and ensure the viability of their long-term operations. This is not the time to get fancy, complicated or unfocused. Companies will move towards what they have absolute confidence in doing and what they excel at doing very well. They will sell non-core assets, trim down and aggressive spending of growth areas of their business will become more conservative.

This entire series is about business fundamentals and giving my readers insight into how I approach any business when investing. I believe good business practices lead to better businesses and excellent investment opportunities.

I will focus on companies that have low or negligible debt, that make a profit, who never compete on price and never sacrifice margins, who have competent and experienced management, that pay me a dividend for the capital I invest, that have a sustainable competitive advantage, that have management who have the pulse of their business and who can focus on doing what they do best. Meanwhile the main theme of my portfolio management will be a focus on capital preservation, quality investments and using indexed products to buy into various markets cheaply that I don't fully understand.

There are obviously other items I focus on when investing, but this series I’ve shared I feel will offer investors the best chance to be successful no matter the economic environment.

Bottom Line: Be rational in your investing activities and understand what you want to own. Know your risk tolerance, review it or revise your expectations of risk if you must. Losing money is inevitable when you invest - no one can escape that. What you can do is minimize your risk. Focus on Enduring Value and you’ll do fine in the end and over the long-term.

Remember...Quantity is no replacement for Quality


Click here to see how future posts can be delivered directly to you

Tuesday, October 7, 2008

My Short-term Plan IX:

This is a continuation of my 10 part series on the core concepts I am focusing on in this difficult market environment. (Part I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII)


Number 9:

One of my most successful Value Rules is something I call The 5% Rule.

Whenever I assess management of a company I look to see if they have the pulse of the business at all times. My biggest fear is investing into a company where management is out of touch with employees, industry trends or customers/clients.

Why?

Management are a group of individuals who make decisions on a daily basis that affect the operations, revenues, expenses and profits of the business. If they don’t understand their customers, the barriers affecting their business or limitations on their own capabilities than mistakes can happen. I don’t like mistakes because mistakes cost the company money and cost me money as a shareholder. My 5% Rule hinges on the fact that when a company’s management provides revenue, expenses or profit expectations for a quarter or year of a business that those results are within +/-5% of their guidance.

I’ll help put this into perspective:

Company MNO & Company PQR sell premium bandaids to consumers in a specific geographic area of Europe. Company MNO gives guidance for the quarter that sales will increase 10% year over year while Company PQR gives the same guidance (sales to increase 10%). When each company reports their quarterly revenues Company MNO reports an increase of 10.3% and Company PQR reports an increase of 15%. Based on that information, which company would you be happier with?

Investors at first glance might quickly respond “Company PQR!!...they sold more bandaids than they expected.” The question I pose to those investors is: Who has the pulse of their market better and why should that matter?

Company PQR originally guided for sales to increase 10%, but ended up with 15%. That’s 50% higher than they expected. Company MNO guided the same 10% increase, but missed sales by 3% (0.03) from their stated expectations. If this was a single quarter of unexpected sales increases than Company PQR might be ok, but if it happens consistently what it shows me as an investor is that management can’t adequately predict where sales will go. They don’t have the pulse of the business.

Let’s put this in a different perspective. Company PQR increases sales by only 5% from stated guidance of 10%. That would be the same 50% change, but to the downside and what would likely happen to the stock? If Company MNO reported an increase of +/- 3% from their guidance likely the market reaction would be to a lesser degree and as an investor your downside would be limited.

Bottom Line: The predictability of operations is imperative to me as an investor. I stick very closely to my 5% rule (+/- 5%) on a regular basis to gauge how management is doing on taking the pulse of the business. Whether its revenues, expenses, profits or margins I expect decision makers to know what is going on in all aspects of their business and to deliver on what they expect the numbers to be. I need to know that the company has a good hold on what is going on at all times.

Suggested Stocks I Own: Kimberly Clark (KMB), Thomson-Reuters (TRI) & Power Financial (PWF).


Click here to see how future posts can be delivered directly to you

Monday, October 6, 2008

My Short-term Plan VIII:

This is a continuation of my 10 part series on the core concepts I am focusing on in this difficult market environment. (Part I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII)


Number 8:

One valuable quality that any investor can benefit from over the long-term is foresight. I've said before that you don’t need a business degree to understand investing in stocks. What you do need is an understanding of what makes certain businesses successful and that should lead to better investments over the long-term.

A competitive advantage, or moat, is something that Warren Buffett has often highlighted as imperative and a requirement in order for him to invest in a business. While many investors like to use this buzz word in their analysis of stocks the harsh reality is that competitive advantages are rare, fiercely protected and usually not sustainable. The competitive advantages that are sustainable provide their respective companies with significant long-term benefits that can last years or decades.

A sustainable competitive advantage (SCA) acts as a moat to protect a business from competition attempting to overtake its operations. The larger the moat, the further away the attack must come from and the greater the resources needed in order to penetrate this protective barrier. A SCA comes in more than one form and often exists due to a company’s ability to secure an advantage that no one else can duplicate or acquire without significant financial resources. These can include strategically owned global real estate as with McDonald’s, supply chain management in the case of Walmart or owning a patent or process that allows a company to manufacture a product at a much cheaper cost than competitors.

A SCA doesn’t allow a company to sell a product or service cheaper than their competition, but it allows them to enjoy a much higher profit margin. This relates full circle back to my earlier post on why a company never competes on price.

Take Company ABC: they can manufacture a product for $7/unit because of their specific patented process. But their global competitor Company XYZ can only make the same product for $10/unit. The patent won’t expire for another 30 years, but the products are in high perpetual demand over the coming decades. Company XYZ sells their products for $12/unit, but so does Company ABC. Why? Because they can.

The profit margins for Company XYZ are 20% while the same margins for Company ABC are 43%. In an industry with competition rules (no monopolies) why would Company ABC ever sell their product at a 20% margin when they can get double because of their SCA? Even if they dropped their price by $1, why sacrifice the margins unless you want to put your competition out of business?

A SCA in this current environment allows a company to enjoy higher margins than their respective competition and places a company in a much better financial & operational position for the future. This is why cutting margins right now is suicide in my view for a business.

A company can use higher margins to build cash, continue growing their international presence, grow their market share through innovative marketing initiatives or re-invest back into the business for future business cycles. This is where a focus on margins comes into my current investment strategy.

Bottom Line: focus on companies that have a SCA or competitive advantage that will sustain them through this difficult economic period. If a company is properly managed they will be in a much better position when the economy emerges on the other side of this downturn. In comparison their competition will continue to struggle to grow profits, expand their operations and only hope to sustain their market share.

Suggested Stocks I Own: Walmart (WMT) & Exelon (EXC)


Click here to see how future posts can be delivered directly to you

Sunday, October 5, 2008

My Short-term Plan VII:

This is a continuation of my 10 part series on the core concepts I am focusing on in this difficult market environment. (Part I, II, III, IV, V, VI)


Number 7:

If as an investor you can’t beat the index then just give up!

I don’t mean investing altogether, but if you find that your actively managed fund, stock portfolio or alternative investments are doing poorer than the overall index – simply buy the index.

Indexing is cheap, effective and you can do it without even looking at the markets on a day-to-day basis. Invest your money into the couch potato portfolio, set up an automatic monthly purchase schedule and DCA (dollar cost average) into your four core holdings over the next few years.

As a long-term investor you’d be hard pressed to find a better alternative if investing in individual stocks isn’t your forte. If you have a long-term investing horizon and don’t have the stomach for stock selection than you can simply set it, forget it and rebalance on an annual or bi-annual basis to reset your set allocation of funds.

Bottom Line: Protect yourself. If you don’t have the tools or knowledge to do the required due diligence and invest directly into equities invest into a set of indices that over the long-term will recover, compound and grow.

Suggested Funds I Own: TD CDN Bond Index-e (TDB909), TD CDN Index-e (TDB900), TD US Index-e (TDB902) & TD International Index-e (TDB911)


Click here to see how future posts can be delivered directly to you

Saturday, October 4, 2008

My Short-term Plan VI:

This is a continuation of my 10 part series on the core concepts I am focusing on in this difficult market environment. (Part I, II, III, IV, V)


Number 6:

This 10 part series focuses on some fairly simple concepts to put into use during these market conditions. Capital Preservation.

Any investor in the markets the past year knows the importance of focusing on the preservation of your capital. We’ve seen large scale failures, market indices down in excess of 20% and capitulation that’s thrown equities & fixed income securities on a volatile ride.

All of my ten points in this series I feel comfortable with as methods of protecting my invested capital. But one of the simplest methods deals with diversification and asset allocation. While bonds are boring and barely yield the rate of annual inflation they are stable, relatively safe and can buffer your portfolio from the extremes of volatility. An investor with a ratio of 70% equities to 30% fixed income (70/30) may want to consider dropping their equity exposure to 65/45 or 60/40 in an attempt to minimize losses. Or an investor may want to increase their equity exposure because of perceived value in the market. The important thing to maintain here is a focus on how you want your capital exposed to risk in the market.

Bottom Line: Regardless of age every investor should have some exposure to safe assets and while bonds, GIC’s or cash are not exciting they tend to provide a much safe haven over equities.

Suggested Stocks I Own: Canadian Utilities Preferred Series B (CU.PR.B), iShares CDN Bond Index Fund (XBB) & TD CDN Bond Index Fund-E (TDB909)


Click here to see how future posts can be delivered directly to you

Friday, October 3, 2008

My Short-term Plan V:

This is a continuation of my 10 part series on the core concepts I am focusing on in this difficult market environment. (Part I, II, III, IV)


Number 5:

Yield. That might not seem to be a very powerful word to investors who ignore stocks that pay dividends in preference for high growth stocks, but yield is something you want to focus on in this period. A dividend is much more than being paid to wait – it’s a return for your stake in a business. The sky is the limit for a fast growing company, but without returning value to shareholders in a tangible form there’s no knowing where the stock will stop when that share price declines. While a dividend won’t always provide support for a stock, it generally protects against the downside if the company’s operations and cashflow are stable.

Dividend growth might be sparse, absent or only meet inflation, but a dividend cut won’t be taken kindly by me or other shareholders. A dividend cut by long entrenched management immediately indicates to me that they inadequately perceived the strength of their operations and put the company in a dangerous position. Likewise I will not invest in a company that issues debt or capital to pay their dividend. The company would be no further ahead in the end and my money is better off in my pocket than in the hands of someone else who mismanages it.

Bottom Line: I want something in my pocket every quarter from a stock that I own. This is my return if the stock goes nowhere during this period. At the cost of current capital in the markets I have the expectation that I deserve a dividend if a company wants me to provide them with capital because capital comes at a premium. I wouldn’t loan any bank money without a guaranteed return and I have the same expectation from a company.

Suggested Stocks I Own: Toronto Dominion Bank (TD), IGM Financial (IGM) & Rogers Communication (RCI.B)


Click here to see how future posts can be delivered directly to you

Thursday, October 2, 2008

My Short-term Plan IV:

This is a continuation of my 10 part series on the core concepts I am focusing on in this difficult market environment. (Part I, II, III)

Number 4:

Any long-time reader of this site will know that I place a great emphasis on the quality and competency of the management of companies I invest in. The reason for this is fairly simple and straightforward: as a shareholder I invest capital into the business and I expect management to properly manage that resource. I invest with the expectation of a return and generally want management with interest similar to those of my own.

This environment will put managers and decision makers of any business to the test and hard decisions will need to be made. Those with strategic foresight will be stars that will shine and the ineffective wannabes who focus on personal achievement and profits will crash and burn.

I never have the expectation that management will have 100% of my interests aligned with their own, but I want a majority. In this environment management might not be able to put all my interests first as a shareholder, but I want to see initiative taken to protect the business through this difficult period. I want management that focuses on not just the short-term, but the long-term as well. I’m looking for managers who have the capability to improve the longevity of their business model, products & services and the competitive stance in their respective industry.

My expectations of dividend increases that outpace twice the rate inflation might need to be trimmed towards a more conservative perspective as will share buybacks and other initiatives. I need to realize as a shareholder that the business may need that additional cashflow for operating needs that better place the business in a position to grow in the future. What I expect is that management will focus on cost reductions, investments in meaningful assets that contribute a significant long-term ROI and who can properly seek strategic solutions that I consider imperative to the long-term health of the company.

Bottom Line: At the end of this cycle I want businesses that are standing in an equal or better financial, strategic and operating position than when they entered it. A business pays a CEO a lot of money to steer the ship in & out of port on time and without incident. These are not the times for young executives to make bold risky moves in order to further their career or for managers to take their finger off the pulse of the business. An investor has to ask only one question when assessing management of the company: Do I Trust Them?

Suggested Stocks I Own: Johnson & Johnson (JNJ), Wells Fargo (WFC), Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS) & Atco (ACO.X).

Side Note: I think it's important for readers to put into context the value we're seeing among conservative, well managed companies with a global presence. In the case of Atco (ACO.X) it is currently trading around July 2006 levels in this market environment. Since then it has grown its dividend 14.6%, EPS has grown by 28.2% and the book value per share has grown 9.7%.


Click here to see how future posts can be delivered directly to you